Critics/judges are losers who didn’t make it doing what they wanted to do, and somehow decided that THEY know how others can be successful at what THEY THEMSELVES couldn’t do well, so they start a career criticizing what other people do who, in virtually every case, do a better job than the critic/judge ever did.

The word “critic” alone is a negative, as it’s related to “criticism”, which is generally always negative, and when it’s not, it’s generally always condescending & patronizing fluff meant to cater to the masses so that the critic/judge is liked, because all that matters anymore is not whether you’re good or bad, but whether you’re liked by enough people.

Regardless of what they say and regardless of what they actually think in their own deluded minds, critics do not come into an event with a neutral, wait-and-see attitude — they know in advance whether they will like the event or not, and that always clouds their judgment. If they don’t like the event, even if it’s the best event that could ever have happened, it will get a lukewarm review at best, with a lot of “finding faults” in the criticism. If they expected to like the event, it will be the most fawning B.S. where they can’t possible be objective & impartial no matter how bad it actually went.

The point is, don’t listen to reviews or critics or judges — try things out on your own & use your own brain for something more than a pleasure point you continually press for your own enjoyment, you narcissistic hedonistic bastard/bitch you.